La libertad de prensa, no se negocia ni se condiciona... se ejerce.

Autonomous Weapons: an Open Letter from AI & Robotics Researchers


Autonomous weapons will become the Kalashnikovs of tomorrow Photo: Archive Infolliteras

Autonomous weapons select and engage targets without human intervention. They might include, for example, armed quadcopters that can search for and eliminate people meeting certain pre-defined criteria, but do not include cruise missiles or remotely piloted drones for which humans make all targeting decisions. Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology has reached a point where the deployment of such systems is — practically if not legally — feasible within years, not decades, and the stakes are high: autonomous weapons have been described as the third revolution in warfare, after gunpowder and nuclear arms.

Many arguments have been made for and against autonomous weapons, for example that replacing human soldiers by machines is good by reducing casualties for the owner but bad by thereby lowering the threshold for going to battle. The key question for humanity today is whether to start a global AI arms race or to prevent it from starting. If any major military power pushes ahead with AI weapon development, a global arms race is virtually inevitable, and the endpoint of this technological trajectory is obvious: autonomous weapons will become the Kalashnikovs of tomorrow. Unlike nuclear weapons, they require no costly or hard-to-obtain raw materials, so they will become ubiquitous and cheap for all significant military powers to mass-produce. It will only be a matter of time until they appear on the black market and in the hands of terrorists, dictators wishing to better control their populace, warlords wishing to perpetrate ethnic cleansing, etc. Autonomous weapons are ideal for tasks such as assassinations, destabilizing nations, subduing populations and selectively killing a particular ethnic group. We therefore believe that a military AI arms race would not be beneficial for humanity. There are many ways in which AI can make battlefields safer for humans, especially civilians, without creating new tools for killing people.

Just as most chemists and biologists have no interest in building chemical or biological weapons, most AI researchers have no interest in building AI weapons — and do not want others to tarnish their field by doing so, potentially creating a major public backlash against AI that curtails its future societal benefits. Indeed, chemists and biologists have broadly supported international agreements that have successfully prohibited chemical and biological weapons, just as most physicists supported the treaties banning space-based nuclear weapons and blinding laser weapons.

In summary, we believe that AI has great potential to benefit humanity in many ways, and that the goal of the field should be to do so. Starting a military AI arms race is a bad idea, and should be prevented by a ban on offensive autonomous weapons beyond meaningful human control.

See the letter:

Delegación china visita Palacio de Gobierno y Yucatán

Según el gobierno estatal se promoverá ante las autoridades chinas la Zona Económica Especial (ZEE) que se establecerá en Yucatán, dirigida a impulsar a los sectores de ciencias y tecnologías de la información y c
Leer Noticia

Alcalde Mauricio Vila anuncia implementación del proyecto piloto City Lab en Mérida

Las firmas Ikusi y Cysco Systems donarán 420 mil euros para la aplicación de tecnologías de la información en la mejora de la gobernanza Leer Noticia

Poseía, arte y tecnología en El Olimpo y Casa Telmex de Mérida

La muestra estará disponible hasta el 23 de abril para el público en general, la entrada es gratuita; entre las obras hay retratos y paisajes 
Leer Noticia

Desarrollan APP para robot sexual

La nueva frontera del sexo, el sexo con robots, tiene ahora una novedad: una nueva APP desarrollada por el director de Cyborg, Matt McMullen. Foto vía vídeo
Leer Noticia